Neurodiversity, Linguistics, Etymology, John 1, binaureal rhythms, Ographer Ocean Duran, mAPPloc8 - KAIROS

• DpH20 - Sequence 01.mp4

• wpdaaudio2.m4a

• Neurodiverse Journey of Water... another OceanRemix

• RiverofOcean (LOGOS) In the beginning was the WORD

  One of my first dual mixes... just something to keep the mind focus, centered... and good way to listen to something different... songs are unatlered... just trying to match the sounds.. without havin

• OceanremixedLOGy101mixOD24ozED

  This is "OceanremixedLOGy101" by oceanduran on Vimeo, the home for high quality videos and the people who love them.

• oceanremixEDnuero4 (ETHOS)and the word was WITH God...

  In rhetoric, ethos (credibility of the speaker) is one of the three artistic proofs (pistis, πίστις) or modes of persuasion (other principles being logos and pathos) discussed by Aristotle in 'Rhetoric' as a component of argument. Speakers must establish ethos from the start. This can involve "moral competence" only; Aristotle, however, broadens the concept to include expertise and knowledge.[8][9] Ethos is limited, in his view, by what the speaker says. Others, however, contend that a speaker's ethos extends to and is shaped by the overall moral character and history of the speaker—that is, what people think of his or her character before the speech has even begun (cf Isocrates). According to Aristotle, there are three categories of ethos: phronesis – useful skills & practical wisdom arete – virtue, goodwill eunoia – goodwill towards the audience

• oceanremixedKISSbody {pathos}and the word was GOD

  Methods Emotional appeal can be accomplished in many ways, such as the following: by a metaphor or storytelling, commonly known as a hook; by passion in the delivery…

• OceanREmixED280 {kairos} HE was with God in the beginning..

  Kairos (Greek for “right time,” “season” or “opportunity”)  Refers to the “timeliness” of an argument. Modern rhetorical…

• OceanremixedoLDnEW (SEMANTICS) Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

  In English, the study of meaning in language has been known by many names that involve the Ancient Greek word σῆμα (sema, "sign, mark, token"). In 1690, a Greek rendering of the term semiotics, the interpretation of signs and symbols, finds an early allusion in John Locke's An Essay Concerning Human Understanding: The third Branch may be called σηµιωτικὴ [simeiotikí, "semiotics"], or the Doctrine of Signs, the most usual whereof being words, it is aptly enough termed also λογικὴ, Logick. In 1831, the term sematology is suggested for the third branch of division of knowledge akin to Locke; the "signs of our knowledge".[2] In 1857, the term semasiology (borrowed from German Semasiologie) is attested in Josiah W. Gibbs' Philological studies with English illustrations:[3] The development of intellectual and moral ideas from physical, constitutes an important part of semasiology, or that branch of grammar which treats of the development of the meaning of words. It is built on the analogy and correlation of the physical and intellectual worlds. In 1893, the term semantics is used to translate French sémantique as used by Michel Bréal.[4] Some years later, in Essai de Sémantique, Bréal writes:[5] What I have tried to do is to draw some broad lines, to mark some divisions and as a provisional plan on a field not yet exploited, and which requires the combined work of several generations of linguists. I therefore ask the reader to consider this book as a simple Introduction to the science I have proposed to call Semantics. [In footnote:] Σημαντικὴ τέχνη, the science of significations [i.e., what it means], from the verb σημαίνω "to signify", as opposed to Phonetics, the science of sounds [i.e., what it sounds like].

• GravityNavigate_0 (PRAGMATICS) In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind.

  The Word Became Flesh 1 aIn the beginning was bthe Word, and cthe Word was with God, and dthe Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning… In linguistics and related fields, pragmatics is the study of how context contributes to meaning. The field of study evaluates how human language is utilized in social interactions, as well as the relationship between the interpreter and the interpreted.[1] Linguists who specialize in pragmatics are called pragmaticians. The field has been represented since 1986 by the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA). Major levels of linguistic structure. Pragmatics is shown as the outermost layer. Pragmatics encompasses phenomena including implicature, speech acts, relevance and conversation,[2] as well as nonverbal communication. Theories of pragmatics go hand-in-hand with theories of semantics, which studies aspects of meaning, and syntax which examines sentence structures, principles, and relationships. The ability to understand another speaker's intended meaning is called pragmatic competence.[3][4][5] In 1938, Charles Morris first distinguished pragmatics as an independent subfield within semiotics, alongside syntax and semantics.[6] Pragmatics emerged as its own subfield in the 1950s after the pioneering work of J.L. Austin and Paul Grice.[7][8]

• oceanremixedCityScape ($yntax). Micah1Micah7 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome[a] it

  Sequencing of subject, verb, and object Edit "Subject and object" redirects here. For philosophical terms, see Subject (philosophy) and Object (philosophy). One basic description of a language's syntax is the sequence in which the subject (S), verb (V), and object (O) usually appear in sentences. Over 85% of languages usually place the subject first, either in the sequence SVO or the sequence SOV. The other possible sequences are VSO, VOS, OVS, and OSV, the last three of which are rare. In most generative theories of syntax, the surface differences arise from a more complex clausal phrase structure, and each order may be compatible with multiple derivations. However, word order can also reflect the semantics or function of the ordered elements.[4]1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. 3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day. 6 And God said, “Let there be a vault between the waters to separate water from water.” 7 So God made the vault and separated the water under the vault from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the vault “sky.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the second day. 9 And God said, “Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear.” And it was so. 10 God called the dry ground “land,” and the gathered waters he called “seas.” And God saw that it was good. 11 Then God said, “Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds.” And it was so. 12 The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. 13 And there was evening, and there was morning—the third day. 14 And God said, “Let there be lights in the vault of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark sacred times, and days and years, 15 and let them be lights in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth.” And it was so. 16 God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. 17 God set them in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth, 18 to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fourth day. 20 And God said, “Let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the vault of the sky.” 21 So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living thing with which the water teems and that moves about in it, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. 22 God blessed them and said, “Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth.” 23 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fifth day. 24 And God said, “Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: the livestock, the creatures that move along the ground, and the wild animals, each according to its kind.” And it was so. 25 God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. 26 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground.” 27 So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them. 28 God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground.” 29 Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. 30 And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds in the sky and all the creatures that move along the ground—everything that has the breath of life in it—I give every green plant for food.” And it was so. 31 God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning—the sixth day

• oceanremixedPraise (Morphology) 1 corinthians 14 There was a man sent from God whose name was John. 7 He came as a witness to testify concerning that light, so that through him all might believe

  Intelligibility in Worship 14 Follow the way of love and eagerly desire gifts of the Spirit, especially prophecy. 2 For anyone who… In linguistics, morphology (/mɔːrˈfɒlədʒi/ mor-FOL-ə-jee)[1] is the study of words, how they are formed, and their relationship to other words in the same language.[2][3] It analyzes the structure of words and parts of words such as stems, root words, prefixes, and suffixes. Morphology also looks at parts of speech, intonation and stress, and the ways context can change a word's pronunciation and meaning. Morphology differs from morphological typology, which is the classification of languages based on their use of words,[4] and lexicology, which is the study of words and how they make up a language's vocabulary.[5] Major levels of linguistic structure. Morphology is shown encompassed by syntax, and encompassing phonology. While words, along with clitics, are generally accepted as being the smallest units of syntax, in most languages, many words can be related to other words by rules that collectively describe the grammar for that language. For example, English speakers recognize that the words dog and dogs are closely related, differentiated only by the noun-bound plurality morpheme "-s". By contrast, Classical Chinese has very little morphology, using almost exclusively unbound morphemes ("free" morphemes) and it relies on word order to convey meaning. (Most words in modern Standard Chinese ["Mandarin"], however, are compounds and most roots are bound.) These are understood as grammars that represent the morphology of the language. The rules understood by a speaker reflect specific patterns or regularities in the way words are formed from smaller units in the language they are using, and how those smaller units interact in speech. In this way, morphology is the branch of linguistics that studies patterns of word formation within and across languages and attempts to formulate rules that model the knowledge of the speakers of those languages. Phonological and orthographic modifications between a base word and its origin may be partial to literacy skills. Studies have indicated that the presence of modification in phonology and orthography makes morphologically complex words harder to understand and that the absence of modification between a base word and its origin makes morphologically complex words easier to understand. Morphologically complex words are easier to comprehend when they include a base word.[6] Polysynthetic languages, such as Chukchi, have words composed of many morphemes. For example, the Chukchi word "təmeyŋəlevtpəγtərkən", meaning "I have a fierce headache", is composed of eight morphemes t-ə-meyŋ-ə-levt-pəγt-ə-rkən that may be glossed. The morphology of such languages allows for each consonant and vowel to be understood as morphemes, while the grammar of the language indicates the usage and understanding of each morpheme. The discipline that deals specifically with the sound changes occurring within morphemes is morphophonology.

• Crom8orch (Phonology) He himself was not the light; he came only as a witness to the light.

  he Panchronic program in phonology is a development from structural approaches to diachrony.[9] Structural approaches to diachrony study the way in which phonological…

• 3 videos (Language and Linguistics) videos 28 (Phonetics) The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. 11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— 13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God.

  For the study of phonemes, or how languages organize sounds, see Phonology. For the method of teaching reading and writing, see Phonics. For other uses, see Phonetics (disambiguation). Part of a series on Phonetics Part of the Linguistics Series Subdisciplines AcousticArticulatoryAuditory Articulation Places of articulation LabialDentalAlveolarPostalveolarPalatalVelarUvularLaryngeal Manners of articulation ConsonantPlosiveAffricateFricativeNasalApproximantLiquidLateralVowel Airstream mechanisms PulmonicGlottalicLingualPercussive Acoustics Phonation (Voicing) Fundamental frequencyGlottisPitchPitch accentSource–filter theoryToneVoicelessness Phonation types ModalCreakyBreathy Perception Acoustic cuesAphasiaCategorical perceptionHearingNeural encoding of soundProsody Theories of speech perception Acoustic landmarksExemplar theoryMotor theory Linguistics portal vte Part of a series on Linguistics OutlineHistoryIndex General linguistics Applied linguistics Theoretical frameworks Topics Portal vte Major levels of linguistic structure. Phonetics is shown as the innermost layer. Phonetics is a branch of linguistics that studies how humans produce and perceive sounds, or in the case of sign languages, the equivalent aspects of sign.[1] Linguists who specialize in studying the physical properties of speech are phoneticians. The field of phonetics is traditionally divided into three sub-disciplines based on the research questions involved such as how humans plan and execute movements to produce speech (articulatory phonetics), how various movements affect the properties of the resulting sound (acoustic phonetics), or how humans convert sound waves to linguistic information (auditory phonetics). Traditionally, the minimal linguistic unit of phonetics is the phone—a speech sound in a language which differs from the phonological unit of phoneme; the phoneme is an abstract categorization of phones, and it is also defined as the smallest unit that discerns meaning between sounds in any given language.[2] Phonetics deals with two aspects of human speech: production—the ways humans make sounds—and perception—the way speech is understood. The communicative modality of a language describes the method by which a language produces and perceives languages. Languages with oral-aural modalities such as English produce speech orally (using the mouth) and perceive speech aurally (using the ears). Sign languages, such as Australian Sign Language (Auslan) and American Sign Language (ASL), have a manual-visual modality, producing speech manually (using the hands) and perceiving speech visually (using the eyes). ASL and some other sign languages have in addition a manual-manual dialect for use in tactile signing by deafblind speakers where signs are produced with the hands and perceived with the hands as well. Language production consists of several interdependent processes which transform a non-linguistic message into a spoken or signed linguistic signal. After identifying a message to be linguistically encoded, a speaker must select the individual words—known as lexical items—to represent that message in a process called lexical selection. During phonological encoding, the mental representation of the words are assigned their phonological content as a sequence of phonemes to be produced. The phonemes are specified for articulatory features which denote particular goals such as closed lips or the tongue in a particular location. These phonemes are then coordinated into a sequence of muscle commands that can be sent to the muscles, and when these commands are executed properly the intended sounds are produced. These movements disrupt and modify an airstream which results in a sound wave. The modification is done by the articulators, with different places and manners of articulation producing different acoustic results. For example, the words tack and sack both begin with alveolar sounds in English, but differ in how far the tongue is from the alveolar ridge. This difference has large effects on the air stream and thus the sound that is produced. Similarly, the direction and source of the airstream can affect the sound. The most common airstream mechanism is pulmonic—using the lungs—but the glottis and tongue can also be used to produce airstreams. Language perception is the process by which a linguistic signal is decoded and understood by a listener. In order to perceive speech the continuous acoustic signal must be converted into discrete linguistic units such as phonemes, morphemes, and words. In order to correctly identify and categorize sounds, listeners prioritize certain aspects of the signal that can reliably distinguish between linguistic categories. While certain cues are prioritized over others, many aspects of the signal can contribute to perception. For example, though oral languages prioritize acoustic information, the McGurk effect shows that visual information is used to distinguish ambiguous information when the acoustic cues are unreliable. Modern phonetics has three branches: Articulatory phonetics, which addresses the way sounds are made with the articulators, Acoustic phonetics, which addresses the acoustic results of different articulations, and Auditory phonetics, which addresses the way listeners perceive and understand linguistic signals

• OceanremixedFire1 14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth

  Once upon a time when all the spirits were in line with all that it was natural.... This is the preface before the truth about the current world. Please look for…

• OceanremixedREtroGRADe (John testified concerning him. He cried out, saying, “This is the one I spoke about when I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’”) 16 Out of his fullness we have all received grace in place of grace already given. 17 For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. 18 No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God and[b] is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him known

  This is "OceanremixedREtroGRADe" from within the EAR+h

• oceanremixedarkitext as the prophet Isaiah said.” 24 Now those who were sent were from the Pharisees. 25 And they asked him, saying, “Why then do you baptize if you are not the Christ, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet?” 26 John answered them, saying, “I baptize with water, but there stands One among you whom you do not know. 27 It is He who, coming after me, [i]is preferred before me, whose sandal strap I am not worthy to loose.” 28 These things were done in [j]Bethabara beyond the Jordan, where John was baptizing.

  Entering into the world of the spirits and seeing the world (part A)

• OceanremixED4kRiverz

  another oceanremix i call the 4 rivers... i Have the original of this called river of OCEAN... this remix is amped and armed...

• Oceanremixedtsunami.mp4

• lists and notesAll eyes are on Hiʻilawe In the sparkling lowlands of Maukele I have not been trapped by the gossip Chattering everywhere in Waipiʻo I am not caught For I am the mist of the mountains I am the darling of the parents And a lei for the necks of grandparents *Beloved of my parents The fragrance is wafted from Puna And lives at Hiʻilawe waterfall I was at the bosom of Haʻi, the woman At the beloved bosom of Haʻinakolo Annoyed at the many birds They were indifferent to the distress they caused You are my companion in the day of joy The many birds there caused a commotion It is my great skill The waves of the ocean overwhelm us The ocean rages fearfully But my steering is skillfull Hurry, let us go close to the wharf I am your new love to be kissed My flower, my lei, my love for you Is unforgettable like the muilan flower Tell the refrain All eyes are on Hiʻilawe *The fragrance is wafted from Puna

  OceanREmixEDpolarITURE The eleMENtALLs ... during the course of History we know what comes before us, for if it was not called "history", our fault would be lack of Wisdom. What has past and what is of the present, History resides in a kind truth being that is subject for what is preserved in our books and knowledge. However, we document the ages because during that time, we are with the technology to allow for the World to be informed. The information of what is communicated does not always reflect what the Truth of the story might be, but again, as a reflection to whom is able to communicate the version he knows. Our History books do not lie, but they do not teach, thus Truth is disregarded as to what the malice or matter of the entirety would show to justify or rectify "why". We will always continue in this way it seems, because of the simple structure designed to pass on to the future. In this manner of documenting we have to find the truth to what really went on... thus wisdom reveals to us something greater to be for us in store. The Future, a hope of what today does not show us, but a direction in which by God's grace allows us to continue in our training and ability to attain truth or satisfaction. We look towards tomorrow because we want to know that our works and creations will thrive and prosper on through the near future, thus providing our hearts the hope that life accepts our legacy. The preDICTION... Life has given us many ways to discover ourselves by allowing for us to always increase in our nature... the ability to evolve. What we have discovered in time, is that we do not produce to destroy, but to create. Communication in the recent past eras rely mainly on what it is that we wanted to find comfort in, so that we could stabilize in our environments and family. We increased in our technology and ways to uncover the physics of how media and electronics are vital in this human nature. The World has allowed for many different natures to thrive and increase... because of this variety, we have created and discovered soo much in presenting information as communication. However, during this present day... and within recent events, we seem to focus ourselves on our media and electronics. And at these times, straying from the path of "why" and "how" we have come so far from where our knowledge first started, we find the cause deriving from what the media "hype" influences us on. If then we are turned in our focus to what it is that we have created, where is the point during this age which has detoured us? In our world of profession and career, we forget that the World works because it is it's nature, thus it does not worry. However, we have worried our own spirit by the means of a curvy path that we walk in our media and electronics. Purpose is that in which Wisdom has it's origins of Thee Truth and we do not live on rumors or philosophy by that alone. We do however, allow ourselves the ability to correlate in life our purpose from which we have moved in our knowledge. As we are known as "consumers" we consume products on the market which have gained in qualitative measure so that we able to apply this in our lives... thus communication and purpose have evolved. To stray away from a path is to discover new paths... If it weren't for the curves and various loops in our paths that we walk, we would not grown or expand in our knowledge to our worlds. Our focus would be strong however, but the ability to evolve is tasking the senses. If we are able to enrich our lives while adjusting to the modern world, we are found to conduct ethical and healthy practices which have also separated our initial worldly progress... communication with roots to create and increase in. Because the times ask for us to increase our value and pull us in the direction of working so that we can achieve, we become consumed. If then we have "become" consumed, then History in this world shows the truth as to why the modern industry acknowledges the world of consumers... To find yourself Lost in world of this is like knowing the depths of Love. A vast plain and measure to open the doors so that we can begin tasking the senses. If we are consumed by the world in which we are standing in, find the meaning and the ability to see the world for what it is... the world will not lie to you, but you might find yourself the ability to lie to yourself. Why would the need to lie be so important? The ways in which we have come from is the answer to this question, thus our perception is greater than any who have known us, and our lies were never in our minds, but the perceptive views we find in "communicating". Consume yourselves with modern world, and when it is time to provide, enrich your ideas and skills by continuing to evolve. Consume yourself so much that evolution is residing in your ethics and principals. When you have truly been a consumer is when you are with the ability to not be a consumer... but an evolved nature suitable for the environment or world that you master. N' ARK~Itexture.... With enlightenment to the world of many paths and theories, do we find a kind nature... a place to conduct ourselves by allowing for others to just the same, and what they find in purpose. Within the Light of what we know, we find a world of walls and straight paths... false truths and without wisdom nor it's reason that is conducive to our "natural" ways of Life. Life is in many forms and many cultures.. it is beautiful and promising. It will not lie to you, it will not tell you something different... it is like the way we have come to educate our scholastic upbringings about the Worlds History. And just like our education of this subject, we did not learn to be prejudice, but with a skill that required from us to achieve in our future the success to what we want to achieve... Only by finding ourselves, we had to not be ourselves... Our schooling was harsh at times, but important to our ways and life. School does not teach you about you... but about everyone else. To know your environment is to know that you are still with the same principles of your schooling. By correlating the education of process to your relative purpose is to provide your environment, a version of what you are consumed in. Thus by consuming yourself, what is found in the scheme of things is the ability to see what IS consuming. By focusing on the element which is performed by the environment, you gain and increase the means to evolve. If then you have understood a version of the environment, you have achieved in the human nature and truth to the modern world... communication. By listening and viewing you life, you allow others to live. There is no prejudice, and everything has been found a purpose. However, what remains are many things just the same... this again is beautiful for what we see is how Wisdom is of time and essence to what it can reveal. Our nature to document and evolve in presenting communication by the means of our media and electronics, we have attained the nature of Wisdom by standing True to our nature. We are without knowledge, but we look... and yet find nothing, but engulfed and consumed by new worlds with and without limits. Relation to knowledge, is like Truth in which Wisdom reveals. Attain the means and direction that your Life is, search not that is beyond the Galaxy or anything else that is not of your world. Consume yourself in Life and you find the wisdom to our nature of what leads us astray. But what leads astray if you can consume the World. You are in truth and without lie... just like Thee Creator! His Words are like that in which speaks to us in our heart... just as He knows our hearts, we know how to Love and find fulfillment. We have created in our worlds the standard living and guidelines which help us in our environments. By knowing your situation is to endure because you have purpose now... consumed in a new world that evolves Wisdom because there is Truth and there is Direction!. N' M'ocean.... the Muse~Icall Bible. Many words make up a sentence, but a sentence will always be a part of a great paragraph who might be a part of an entire book. Thus the book might be a part of a series... which inspires the media to provide. If we did not live in Truth, then how is that we can relate to anything? If everything around you is a lie... then that would call you to be a liar just the same. Truth comes from within, not without. Life will give back to you in the form of evolution because you recognize it... and that it has been a new. To change and yet remain similar finds purpose to a greater scheme of things... If we lose something, or if death is present... then we have overcome Life and transfigured in "living". Just as we can recognize the environment in relation to who and where we have come before it, we are skilled in evolving because we have accepted ourselves completely and then incomplete again. We have not evolved because we have not allowed others to live... thus killing them by which we see them, being without purpose or reason. However, the ethics of Truth says to us the "truth is relative", meaning that we are able to see it because we know of how we relate. So when we find ourselves dead and without evolution or beyond our Life in the World, we find the means in which we act. If we act as though we see something, but have no purpose or find it to be without relation, it is among the dead to us. And if we are among the dead, then why are we continuing to work so hard in life? Perhaps so that we can find fulfillment? Work and toil pay wages and provide for you... but that's less than average living. To segregate the purpose of our nature was not to act alone, but so that we wouldn't be alone. We have seen in the environment the acts in which tell our heart something about how we feel in the day, and have at times accepted this as solitude and nourishing to our wholesomeness or spirit. We want vacation and time away from that…